Science and 2012 (Part Two)
If you haven’t seen the movie trailer for “2012″…please…by all means…do so. It has the promise of being a good action flick.
And, while you’re on the official movie site, www.whowillsurvive2012.com, be sure to follow the links to www.thisistheend.com and www.instituteforhumancontinuity.com.
On these “spoof sites”, Woody Harrelson (who played the dumb bartender, Woody Boyd, on the legendary hit TV show Cheers) now plays a character named Charlie Frost – a self proclaimed Apocalyptic Prognosticator. Both sites were launched as a viral marketing campaign for the movie, due out November 13.
As spoofs go…it’s pretty funny stuff.
Now, how this ties into my current series of posts, “Science and 2012″ is…
If you’ll remember, in my post, “2012 The Five W’s and One H“, I cite the Orson Wells’ classic 1938 radio broadcast, “War of the Worlds” and reintroduced the nationwide pandemonium which broke out because of the show. Cleverly, Wells’ launched the first part of the broadcast as emergency news bulletins and the American public panicked.
That was 70 years ago. If we’re not careful, it could happen again with the movie, “2012″…unless we work together to prevent it.
In, “Science and 2012 (Part One)“, I introduce fellow Hay House author, Gregg Braden, The Global Coherence Initiative and Gregg’s involvement with the fantastic works of the Initiative. Additionally, I write about unusual spikes on the graphs of NOAA’s GOES satellite before, during and after the terrorist attacks on the United States, September 11, 2001.
There is enough empirical evidence to substantiate the conclusion that those spikes registered on the graphs due to a collective human precognition of 9/11 and a collective human reaction to 9/11.
The Global Coherence Initiative is a research project whose members designed, built and maintain a Global Coherence Monitoring System (GCMS) which measures changes in the magnetic field of our earth and in the ionosphere.
Some of the great scientific minds of our time work as a collaborative in the Initiative. For a complete viewing click here.
The project was started in the 1980’s and, so – interestingly enough – the GCMS was yet another scientific detection of magnetic field fluctuations before, during and after the 9/11 incident.
At this point, we know there is equipment which can detect the changes in the earth’s magnetic field. But how is it humans can be the cause of such?
The answer lies within…literally.
Changes in the magnetic field are associated with any number of happenings – synthesis of nutrients in plants, number of reported traffic accidents and changes in brain and nervous system workings.
Logically, then, since we know that the human heart and brain produce electromagnetic waves – with the heart being the far more powerful producer – further, we know that the earth and ionosphere generate large resonances in the same frequency as the human brain and heart, it stands to reason there could be a syncing up of or “coherence” between the human body and earth.
Much of this works in the same way an animal “knows” when a storm is coming, or a parent “knows” when their child is in trouble, etc.
Let’s think about this.
We are a planet of, roughly, 6.7 billion people. If even half of us “synced up” with earth’s magnetic waves what could we accomplish?
Better yet, what would we need to accomplish?
Before I can answer that, it is imperative to note that it is our emotions which send out those electromagnetic waves as it is our emotions which cause all reaction – both positive and negative.
Even our autonomic system could be theorized to work emotionally. You stop breathing, your body sends an SOS to your brain, your brain becomes fearful of your system shutting down and sends the signal back for you to start breathing again.
And there is the answer.
If there can be coherence there can be incoherence. Just as much as we can create positive emotions so can we create negativity.
Which, of course, we knew. But if you thought any negativity you manifested were like electrocuting the earth with a cattle prod…how would that change the way you think, feel, act and react?
The image I painted is harsh but it’s accurate. The idea of thoughts being things goes so far beyond the catchy New Age/Metaphysical phrase it’s morphed into – and now you know why.
In “Science and 2012 (Part Three)”, I’m going to explain, in detail, how we know – scientifi
cally know – we are on the tail end of a huge change.
Make no mistake, 2012 is not a time of wannabe’ predictions made by cave dwellers with gaudy jewelry.
It is real.
It is happening now.
How we work through it is up to us.
(2 votes, average: 3.50 out of 5)
Loading ...
I feel we all have to use our thoughts and heart centre to produce what we are wanting to have in 2012 and beyond. We need to get people to be more aware of the power of thoughts and emotions and get them out of fear and into love. Onward bound!!!
[...] “Science and 2012 (Part One)” and “Science and 2012 (Part Two)“, I introduce fellow Hay House author Gregg Braden, and his involvement in The Global [...]
[...] “Science and 2012 (Part Two)“ [...]
Leave your response!
Tao Quotes
Guest authors:
Archives
Tag Cloud
Daily Stars with Shelley von Strunckel
www.shelleyvonstrunckel.comThere are several interpretations for the current alliance between Venus and Uranus in your sign, all of which involve surprises. While some might be welcome, others could seem worrying, at least at first. In every case they're worth exploring. The more you learn, the more the resulting developments will delight you. By Shelley von Strunckel
It was only a week ago that the planet of vision, Neptune, moved into its own sign, Pisces. This triggered a period of questioning about certain values and objectives you've regarded as unchanging. Once, perhaps, they were. But this is bringing changes in the world around you and, in some way, in everybody's life. By Shelley von Strunckel
While you'd admit to flaws in your character, stubbornness is not one of them. You are, however, urged to examine several situations in which you've simply refused to consider making changes, if not letting go of plans. True, you regard these as essential. Ask a few questions, and you'll discover they're not. By Shelley von Strunckel
Logic will get you a long way. It eliminates confusion and enables you to discuss plans with a clear mind. However, certain tricky individuals require a very different approach. Central to this lighter touch is humour. Once you're able to view the proceedings with humour, you'll realise you've had a very real breakthrough. By Shelley von Strunckel
You sometime stick with a plan or a passion more out of ego than because of logical reasons. Think of this now, before you become so involved in certain arrangements you'd have trouble disentangling yourself from them. Out of character as taking it slowly may be, it's your best option. By Shelley von Strunckel
Don't make the mistake of thinking that there's honour in fighting for certain arrangements that once meant a great deal to you. Not only would keeping these in place be a distraction, once you say farewell to them you'll be free to focus on far more promising, if unexpected, ideas or offers. By Shelley von Strunckel
It's time to acknowledge the only way you'll resolve one especially tricky matter is by standing up to somebody who's a bully. You've tried to satisfy this particular individual, but nothing's worked. That's because you still haven't acknowledged the only thing that has an effect is a simple, head on, confrontation. By Shelley von Strunckel
Only days ago you were battling against the idea of potential alterations in elements of your way or living or activities out in the world. However, you've finally recognised just how much these changes are needed, enough you're actually considering others. This is wise. There are many areas where similar changes would be timely. By Shelley von Strunckel
There's a difference between showing interest in new ideas, which you are, and actually committing to them. You know this but others don't. Bear this in mind, or certain individuals could easily mistake your rather enthusiastic response to these developments as a commitment, when you're doing no more than asking questions. By Shelley von Strunckel
To you, trust is fundamental to any close alliance, personal, professional or otherwise. So when you witness events that raise questions about that trust, you worry, if not become suspicious. While at other times that might be merited, the odds are good there's a rational explanation. You need only ask. By Shelley von Strunckel
Only a week ago, after over a decade there, Neptune departed your sign for good. While you may not be able to describe any discernable change, you'll begin to notice your thinking is clearer and your convictions stronger. Soon this will be joined by a return of feelings of confidence you thought gone forever. By Shelley von Strunckel
If you think an idea is good, that's enough. In the past you've allowed others' questions or even the opposition of certain individuals to keep you from pursuing something you regarded as worthwhile, and to your regret. Now that a similar situation has arisen, ignore others and do what you think is best. By Shelley von Strunckel
© 2009 Shelley von Strunckel